Psychometric properties of the sit-to-stand test for patients with pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review protocol

Author:

Cardoso Natália LopesORCID,de Sá Joceline Ferezini,do Nascimento Larissa F. E.ORCID,Mendes Luciana A.,Bruno Selma,Torres-Castro RodrigoORCID,Fregonezi Guilherme A. F.,Resqueti Vanessa R.ORCID

Abstract

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex syndrome characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressure and classified into five groups, according to dyspnea on exertion and systemic muscle dysfunction. These symptoms can be identified using the sit-to-stand test (STS), which indirectly evaluates exercise tolerance and lower limb muscle strength. Previous studies used the STS in PH; however, psychometric properties to understand and validate this test were not described for patients with PH. Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) of different STS protocols in patients with PH. Methods and analyses This is a systematic review protocol that will include studies using STS in patients with PH. Searches will be conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases following PICOT mnemonic strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). Rayyan software will be used for study selection. The Risk of bias will be assessed using the Consensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool, while the quality of evidence will be assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Two researchers will independently conduct the study, and a third researcher will be consulted in case of disagreement. The psychometric properties will be evaluated according to the COSMIN. This protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, no. CRD42021244271). Conclusion This systematic review will attempt to identify and show the available evidence on STS for different groups of PH and report validity, reliability, and responsiveness of different protocols.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference29 articles.

1. ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension;N Galiè;European Heart Journal,2016

2. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension;G Simonneau;Eur Respir J,2019

3. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension;G Simonneau;J Am Coll Cardiol,2013

4. Clinical characteristics of pulmonary hypertension patients in two reference centers in the city of São Paulo;MS Lapa;Rev Assoc Med Bras,2006

5. Pulmonary hypertension: types and treatments;LJ Rose-Jones;Curr Cardiol Rev,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3