Abstract
The main component of China’s income gap is the urban–rural income gap, which is largely affected by urbanization. It is worth studying how new-type urbanization affects the income gap between urban and rural areas. Research mostly focuses on the urbanization rate as the core explanatory variable to explain the impact using one or two factors. This paper analyzes the mechanism of the effect using a comprehensive number of factors, with the quality of new-type urbanization development as the core explanatory variable. In terms of theoretical research, we believe that new-type urbanization affects the urban–rural income gap by promoting the transfer of labor, changing industrial structure, and policy tendency. Using both static and dynamic empirical analyses, we test the impact of new-type urbanization on the urban–rural income gap based on China’s provincial data. We find that new-type urbanization is conducive to narrowing the income gap between urban and rural areas. The transfer of labor significantly reduces the urban–rural income gap. However, the upgrading of industrial structure will enlarge the gap. The impact of China’s policy orientation is negligible. Policy should focus on promoting urbanization and improving the marginal rate of return of agriculture, improve the level of human capital, reverse the mismatch between employment structure and industrial structure, increase support for rural areas, and make substantial progress in promoting common prosperity.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference32 articles.
1. The origin, divergence, and summary of the dispute between fairness and efficiency;J. Weidong;Contemporary Finance and Economics,2008
2. Distortion of primary distribution, urban bias of fiscal expenditure and urban–rural income gap: Empirical evidence from China’s provincial panel data.;L Genqiang;Research on Quantitative Economy and Technology Economy,2012
3. Growth, income inequality, and fiscal policy: What are the relevant trade-offs?;C García-Peñalosa;J Money Credit Bank,2007
4. A note on the U hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development;S. Robinson;Am Econ Rev,1976