Insights on the differentiation of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths: A study from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network

Author:

Quincer Elizabeth,Philipsborn RebeccaORCID,Morof Diane,Salzberg Navit T.,Vitorino Pio,Ajanovic Sara,Onyango Dickens,Ogbuanu IkechukwuORCID,Assefa NegaORCID,Sow Samba O.,Mutevedzi Portia,El Arifeen Shams,Tippet Barr Beth A.,Scott J. Anthony G.ORCID,Mandomando Inacio,Kotloff Karen L.,Jambai Amara,Akelo Victor,Cain Carrie Jo,Chowdhury Atique Iqbal,Gure Tadesse,Igunza Kitiezo Aggrey,Islam Farzana,Keita Adama Mamby,Madrid Lola,Mahtab Sana,Mehta Ashka,Mitei Paul K.,Ntuli Constance,Ojulong JuliusORCID,Rahman Afruna,Samura Solomon,Sidibe Diakaridia,Thwala Bukiwe NanaORCID,Varo Rosauro,Madhi Shabir A.ORCID,Bassat Quique,Gurley Emily S.,Blau Dianna M.,Whitney Cynthia G.

Abstract

Introduction The high burden of stillbirths and neonatal deaths is driving global initiatives to improve birth outcomes. Discerning stillbirths from neonatal deaths can be difficult in some settings, yet this distinction is critical for understanding causes of perinatal deaths and improving resuscitation practices for live born babies. Methods We evaluated data from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network to compare the accuracy of determining stillbirths versus neonatal deaths from different data sources and to evaluate evidence of resuscitation at delivery in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. CHAMPS works to identify causes of stillbirth and death in children <5 years of age in Bangladesh and 6 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Using CHAMPS data, we compared the final classification of a case as a stillbirth or neonatal death as certified by the CHAMPS Determining Cause of Death (DeCoDe) panel to both the initial report of the case by the family member or healthcare worker at CHAMPS enrollment and the birth outcome as stillbirth or livebirth documented in the maternal health record. Results Of 1967 deaths ultimately classified as stillbirth, only 28 (1.4%) were initially reported as livebirths. Of 845 cases classified as very early neonatal death, 33 (4%) were initially reported as stillbirth. Of 367 cases with post-mortem examination showing delivery weight >1000g and no maceration, the maternal clinical record documented that resuscitation was not performed in 161 cases (44%), performed in 14 (3%), and unknown or data missing for 192 (52%). Conclusion This analysis found that CHAMPS cases assigned as stillbirth or neonatal death after DeCoDe expert panel review were generally consistent with the initial report of the case as a stillbirth or neonatal death. Our findings suggest that more frequent use of resuscitation at delivery and improvements in documentation around events at birth could help improve perinatal outcomes.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3