Abstract
Background
Clinical interpretation of trace results by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Ultra) used as an initial diagnostic test for tuberculosis (TB) may be challenging. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and epidemiology of trace readouts in routine clinical practice in a low TB prevalence setting and to propose guidance on how to manage patients with trace calls considering the data available (clinical, radiological, bacteriological etc.).
Materials and methods
A retrospective, observational, monocentric study was conducted at IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna, Italy between November 2017—December 2020. Presumptive TB patients with at least one Ultra trace result during diagnostic workup before treatment were included in the study. Patients with ongoing anti-TB treatment at the time of the trace call result or with no clinical data available were excluded from the study.
Results
Fifty-nine presumptive TB patients with Ultra trace readouts were included in the study (mean age 37.0 years, 61% males). Four patients had a history of TB in the last 2 years. Twenty-five (42.4%) of the 59 samples with trace results were respiratory material. 57/59 (96.6%) patients started anti-TB treatment soon after obtaining trace results, based on clinical, radiological or other information available, while for two patients with a recent history of TB the trace result did not lead to anti-TB treatment. Culture was positive for M. tuberculosis for 31/59 (52.5%) samples with trace calls: 13/25 (52.0%) were respiratory samples and 18/33 (54.5%) non-respiratory samples. The clinical and/or radiological findings of 47/57 (82.4%) patients given anti-TB therapy improved during treatment.
Conclusion
In low TB incidence settings, Ultra trace calls in presumptive TB patients should be considered as true-positive and treatment should be started promptly, except in cases of recent history of TB, where careful evaluation of other diagnostic criteria is necessary before starting anti-TB treatment. A decisional algorithm for clinical management is proposed.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference17 articles.
1. World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021
2. Cepheid. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra—Commercial Brochure. 2017. Available from: http://www.cepheid.com/administrator/components/com_productcatalog/library-files/5658293188378fce922d67a8e0ac7017-Xpert-MTBRIF-Ultra-Brochure-Commercial-CEIVD-3098-01.pdf
3. Added Value of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a Low-Prevalence Setting;O Opota;J ClinMicrobiol,2019
4. Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics. 2017. Report for WHO. A multicentre non-inferiority diagnostic accuracy study of the Ultra assay compared to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Geneva, Switzerland. Available from https://www.finddx.org/reports-and-landscapes/a-multicentre-non-inferiority-diagnostic-accuracy-study-of-the-ultra-assay-compared-to-the-xpert-mtb-rif-assay/
5. The New Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Improving Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Resistance to Rifampin in an Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Testing;S Chakravorty;mBio,2017
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献