Abstract
Given increased prevalence of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic health tests in recent years, this paper delves into discourses among researchers at professional genomics conferences and lay DTC genetic test users on popular discussion website Reddit to understand the contested value of genetic knowledge and its direct implications for health management. Harnessing ethnographic observations at five conferences and a text -analysis of 52 Reddit threads, we find both experts and lay patient-consumers navigate their own versions of “productive uncertainty.” Experts develop genetic technologies to legitimize unsettled genomics as medical knowledge and mobilize resources and products, while lay patient-consumers turn to Internet forums to gain clarity on knowledge gaps that help better manage their genetic risk states. By showing how the uncertain nature of genomics serves as a productive force placing both parties within a mutually cooperative cycle, we argue that experts and patient-consumers co-produce a form of relational medicalization that concretizes “risk” itself as a disease state.
Funder
UC Berkeley Social Science Matrix
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference54 articles.
1. “Led (astray) by Genetic Maps: The Cartography of the Human Genome and Health Care;A. Lippman;Social Science & Medicine,1992
2. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine;Adele E. Clarke;American Sociological Review,2003
3. Looping Genomes: Diagnostic Change and the Genetic Makeup of the Autism Population;Daniel Navon;AJS; American Journal of Sociology,2016
4. The Politics of Life Itself;Nikolas Rose;Theory, Culture & Society,2001
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献