Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against “cost-free” representations

Author:

Hawkins Brylee,Evans Dee,Preston Anya,Westmoreland Kendra,Mims Callie E.,Lolo Kiara,Rosario Nicholas,Odegaard BrianORCID

Abstract

Is visual perception “rich” or “sparse?” One finding supporting the “rich” hypothesis shows that a specific visual summary representation, color diversity, is represented “cost-free” outside focally-attended regions in dual-task paradigms [1]. Here, we investigated whether this “cost-free” phenomenon for color diversity perception extends to peripheral vision. After replicating previous findings and verifying that color diversity is represented “cost-free” in central vision, we performed two experiments: in our first experiment, we extended the paradigm to peripheral vision and found that in minimally-attended regions of space, color diversity perception was impaired. In a second and final experiment, we added confidence judgments to our task, and found that participants maintained high levels of metacognitive awareness of impaired performance in minimally-attended visual areas in the periphery. These findings provide evidence that color perception may be partially attention-dependent in peripheral vision, and challenge previous views on both sides of the rich vs. sparse debate.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. We See More than We Can Report: ‘Cost Free’ Color Phenomenality Outside Focal Attention;Zohar Z. Bronfman;Psychological Science,2014

2. Rich Conscious Perception Outside Focal Attention;Ned Block;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2014

3. Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future;Daniel J. Simons;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2005

4. To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes;Ronald A. Rensink;Psychological Science,1997

5. The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentations;George Sperling;Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,1960

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3