Abstract
Background
Monitoring COVID-19 infection risk in the general population is a public health priority. Few studies have measured seropositivity using representative, probability samples. The present study measured seropositivity in a representative population of Minnesota residents prior to vaccines and assess the characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs of the population at the outset of the pandemic and their association with subsequent infection.
Methods
Participants in the Minnesota COVID-19 Antibody Study (MCAS) were recruited from residents of Minnesota who participated in the COVID-19 Household Impact Survey (CIS), a population-based survey that collected data on physical health, mental health, and economic security information between April 20 and June 8 of 2020. This was followed by collection of antibody test results between December 29, 2020 and February 26, 2021. Demographic, behavioral, and attitudinal exposures were assessed for association with the outcome of interest, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Of the 907 potential participants from the CIS, 585 respondents then consented to participate in the antibody testing (64.4% consent rate). Of these, results from 537 test kits were included in the final analytic sample, and 51 participants (9.5%) were seropositive. The overall weighted seroprevalence was calculated to be 11.81% (95% CI, 7.30%-16.32%) at of the time of test collection. In adjusted multivariate logistic regression models, significant associations between seroprevalence and the following were observed; being from 23–64 and 65+ age groups were both associated with higher odds of COVID-19 seropositivity compared to the 18–22 age group (17.8 [1.2–260.1] and 24.7 [1.5–404.4] respectively). When compared to a less than $30k annual income reference group, all higher income groups had significantly lower odds of seropositivity. Reporting practicing a number of 10 (median reported value in sample) or more of 19 potential COVID-19 mitigation factors (e.g. handwashing and mask wearing) was associated with lower odds of seropositivity (0.4 [0.1–0.99]) Finally, the presence of at least one household member in the age range of 6 to 17 years old was associated with higher odds of seropositivity (8.3 [1.2–57.0]).
Conclusions
The adjusted odds ratio of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was significantly positively associated with increasing age and having household member(s) in the 6–17 year age group, while increasing income levels and a mitigation score at or above the median were shown to be significantly protective factors.
Funder
Minnesota Department of Health
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference31 articles.
1. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among health care workers in a New York City hospital: A cross-sectional analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic;U Venugopal;International Journal of Infectious Diseases,2021
2. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare, first response, and public safety personnel, detroit metropolitan area, Michigan, USA, May-June 2020;LJ Akinbami;Emerging Infectious Diseases,2020
3. Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among firefighters/paramedics of a US fire department: A cross-sectional study.;AJ Caban-Martinez;Occupational and Environmental Medicine,2020
4. Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.;N Bobrovitz;PLOS ONE,2021