Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: Protocol for a realist review

Author:

Haines-Delmont AlinaORCID,Tsang Anthony,Szifris Kirstine,Craig ElaineORCID,Chapman Melanie,Baker John,Baker Peter,Ridley JamesORCID,Thomson Michaela,Bourlet Gary,Morrison Beth,Duxbury Joy

Abstract

Introduction The use of restrictive practices has significant adverse effects on the individual, care providers and organisations. This review will describe how, why, for whom, and in what circumstances approaches used by healthcare organisations work to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities. Methods and analysis Evidence from the literature will be synthesised using a realist review approach - an interpretative, theory-driven approach to understand how complex healthcare approaches work in reducing the use of restrictive practices in these settings. In step 1, existing theories will be located to explore what approaches work by consulting with key topic experts, holding consultation workshops with healthcare professionals, academics, and experts by experience, and performing an informal search to help develop an initial programme theory. A systematic search will be performed in the second step in electronic databases. Further searches will be performed iteratively to test particular subcomponents of the initial programme theory, which will also include the use of the CLUSTER approach. Evidence judged as relevant and rigorous will be used to test the initial programme theory. In step three, data will be extracted and coded inductively and deductively. The final step will involve using a realist logic of analysis to refine the initial programme theory in light of evidence. This will then provide a basis to describe and explain what key approaches work, why, how and in what circumstances in preventing and reducing the use of restrictive practices in adults with learning disabilities in healthcare settings. Results Findings will be used to provide recommendations for practice and policymaking. Registration In accordance with the guidelines, this realist review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 4th December 2019 (CRD42019158432).

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference54 articles.

1. Office for National Statistics. Estimates of the population for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. 2019. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2019estimates.

2. Multiple physical and mental health comorbidity in adults with intellectual disabilities: Population-based cross-sectional analysis.;S-A Cooper;BMC family practice.,2015

3. A total population study of challenging behaviour in the county of Hedmark, Norway: prevalence, and risk markers.;B Holden;Res Dev Disabil.,2006

4. Prevalence of, and factors associated with, problem behaviors in adults with intellectual disabilities.;S Jones;J Nerv Ment Dis,2008

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3