Abstract
Background
Risk compensation, or matching behavior to a perceived level of acceptable risk, can blunt the effectiveness of public health interventions. One area of possible risk compensation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is antibody testing. While antibody tests are imperfect measures of immunity, results may influence risk perception and individual preventive actions. We conducted a randomized control trial to assess whether receiving antibody test results changed SARS-CoV-2 protective behaviors.
Purpose
Assess whether objective information about antibody status, particularly for those who are antibody negative and likely still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, increases protective behaviors. Secondarily, assess whether a positive antibody test results in decreased protective behaviors.
Methods
In September 2020, we enrolled 1076 undergraduate students, used fingerstick tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and randomized participants to receive their results immediately or delayed by 4 weeks. Two weeks later, participants completed a survey about their engagement in 4 protective behaviors (mask use, social event avoidance, staying home from work/school, ensuring physical distancing). We estimated differences between conditions for each of these behaviors, stratified by antibody status. For negative participants at baseline, we also estimated the difference between conditions for seroconversion over 8 weeks of follow-up.
Results
For the antibody negative participants (n = 1029) and antibody positive participants (n = 47), we observed no significant differences in protective behavior engagement between those who were randomized to receive test results immediately or after 4 weeks. For the baseline antibody negative participants, we also observed no difference in seroconversion outcomes between conditions.
Conclusions
We found that receiving antibody test results did not lead to significant behavior change in undergraduate students whether the SARS-CoV-2 antibody result was positive or negative.
Funder
Charitable donation to IU Foundation
United Arab Emirates
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference32 articles.
1. Simulating COVID-19 in a university environment;PT Gressman;Mathematical biosciences,2020
2. Changing age distribution of the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, May–August 2020;TK Boehmer;Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,2020
3. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 screening strategies to permit the safe reopening of college campuses in the United States;AD Paltiel;JAMA network open,2020
4. Data and policy to guide opening schools safely to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection;MA Honein;JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association,2021
5. American College Health Association. Considerations for reopening institutions of higher education in the COVID-19 era. ACHA; 2020.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献