Abstract
Several disciplines, among them health, sociology, and economics, provide strong evidence that social context is important to individual choices. It is therefore surprising that relatively little research has been focused on integrating the effect of social influence into choice models, especially given the importance of such choices in healthcare. This study developed and empirically tested a choice model that accounts for social network influences in a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We focused on maternal choices for childhood vaccination in Australia, and used an econometric choice model that explicitly 1) incorporated vaccine schedule characteristics, benefits and costs, and 2) represented up to ten different identifiable key influencer types (e.g., partner, parents, friends, healthcare professionals, inter alia), allowing for the attribution of directional importance of each influencer on the gravid woman’s decision to adhere to or reject childhood vaccination. Pregnant women (N = 604) aged 18 years and older recruited from an online panel completed a survey, including a DCE and questions about key influencers. A two-class ordered latent class model was conducted to analyse the DCE data, which assumes that the underlying latent driver (in our case the WHO vaccine hesitancy scale) is ordered, to give a practical interpretation of the meaning of the classes. When the choice model considered both childhood vaccination attributes and key influencers, a very high model fit was reached. The impact of key influencers on maternal choice for childhood vaccination was massive compared to the impact of childhood vaccination attributes. The marginal impact differed between key influencers. Our DCE study showed that the maternal decision for childhood vaccination was essentially almost completely socially driven, suggesting that the potential impact of social network influences can and should be considered in health-related DCEs, particular those where there are likely to be strong underlying social norms dictating decision maker behaviour.
Funder
Australian Research Council
The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference52 articles.
1. Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice;M. Bliemer;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract,2011
2. Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657 recent published articles in journals related to agriculture, environment, or health;P.-A. Mahieu;Rev. Agric. Food Environ. Stud,2017
3. Simultaneous Conjoint-Measurement—a New Type of Fundamental Measurement;R. D. Luce;J. Math. Psychol,1964
4. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections;M. Ryan;Applied Health Economics & Health Policy,2003
5. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature;E. W. De Bekker-Grob;Health Econ,2012
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献