Understanding accelerators to improve SDG-related outcomes for adolescents—An investigation into the nature and quantum of additive effects of protective factors to guide policy making

Author:

Sherr Lorraine,Haag KatharinaORCID,Tomlinson Mark,Rudgard William E.,Skeen Sarah,Meinck Franziska,Du Toit Stefani M.,Steventon Roberts Kathryn J.ORCID,Gordon Sarah L.,Desmond Chris,Cluver Lucie

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown support for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) accelerator concept, which highlights the need to identify interventions or programmatic areas that can affect multiple sustainable development goals (SDGs) at once to boost their achievement. These data have also clearly shown enhanced effects when interventions are used in combination, above and beyond the effect of single interventions. However, detailed knowledge is now required on optimum combinations and relative gain in order to derive policy guidance. Which accelerators work for which outcomes, what combinations are optimum, and how many combinations are needed to maximise effect? The current study utilised pooled data from the Young Carers (n = 1402) and Child Community Care (n = 446) studies. Data were collected at baseline (n = 1848) and at a 1 to 1.5- year follow-up (n = 1740) from children and young adolescents aged 9–13 years, living in South Africa. Measures in common between the two databases were used to generate five accelerators (caregiver praise, caregiver monitoring, food security, living in a safe community, and access to community-based organizations) and to investigate their additive effects on 14 SDG-related outcomes. Predicted probabilities and predicted probability differences were calculated for each SDG outcome under the presence of none to five accelerators to determine optimal combinations. Results show that various accelerator combinations are effective, though different combinations are needed for different outcomes. Some accelerators ramified across multiple outcomes. Overall, the presence of up to three accelerators was associated with marked improvements over multiple outcomes. The benefit of targeting access to additional accelerators, with additional costs, needs to be weighed against the relative gains to be achieved with high quality but focused interventions. In conclusion, the current data show the detailed impact of various protective factors and provides implementation guidance for policy makers in targeting and distributing interventions to maximise effect and expenditure. Future work should investigate multiplicative effects and synergistic interactions between accelerators.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

the UK Economic and Social Research Council and South African National Research Foundation

HEARD at the University of KwaZulu-Natal

South African National Department of Social Development

Claude Leon Foundation

John Fell Fund, University of Oxford

Nuffield Foundation

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council

Leverhulme Trust

Sweden/Norad through a nesting agreement with HelpAge

World Vision

Bernard van Leer Foundation

Firelight Foundation

Save the Children

UNICEF

REPSSI

Help Age

Stop AIDS Now

AIDS Alliance

The Diana Memorial Fund

Comic Relief

The Coalition for Children affected by AIDS

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference32 articles.

1. HIV incidence rates in adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa;SS Karim;The Lancet Global Health,2019

2. UNICEF (2019). Adolescent demographics. https://data.unicef.org/topic/ adolescents/demographics/.

3. UNICEF, CDC (2015). Violence Against Children and Young Women in Malawi: Findings from a National Survey, 2013. Lilongwe. http://www.togetherforgirls.org/wpcontent/uploads/MLW_resources_violencereport_final.pdf.

4. Optimising child and adolescent health and development through an integrated ecological life course approach;M Tomlinson;BMJ,2021

5. Cash plus care: social protection cumulatively mitigates HIV-risk behaviour among adolescents in South Africa;LD Cluver;AIDS,2014

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3