Abstract
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common infection, and high-quality studies report that misdiagnosis is frequent, with diagnostic testing needed to distinguish it from other causes of vaginitis and avoid inappropriate empiric treatment. However, few recent studies have evaluated U.S. healthcare providers’ testing practices for VVC in detail. We evaluated healthcare providers’ self-reported testing practices for VVC and treatment outcomes as part of a nationwide online survey in order to identify potential opportunities for improving VVC testing and treatment in the United States. Among 1,503 providers surveyed, 21.3% reported “always” (7.4%) or “usually” (13.9%) ordering diagnostic testing for patients with suspected VVC; this proportion was higher among gynecologists (36.0%) compared with family practitioners (17.8%) and internists (15.8%). Most providers (91.2%) reported that patients’ VVC “always” (6.4%) or “usually” (84.9%) responds to initial treatment. Whether the symptom resolution reported in this survey was truly related to VVC is unclear given high rates of misdiagnosis and known widespread empiric prescribing. With only about one-in-five providers reporting usually or always performing diagnostic testing for VVC despite guidelines recommending universal use, research is needed to address barriers to proper testing.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference10 articles.
1. Evaluation of Vaginal Complaints.;MR Anderson;JAMA,2004
2. Vaginitis: Diagnosis and Treatment.;HL Paladine;Am Fam Physician,2018
3. Survey of incidence, lifetime prevalence, and treatment of self-reported vulvovaginal candidiasis, United States, 2020.;K Benedict;BMC Women’s Health,2022
4. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis;JD Sobel;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2016
5. CDC. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis 2021 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/candidiasis.htm.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献