Efficacy and safety of vapocoolant spray for vascular puncture in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Wang Lan,Fang Liu,Zhou Yang,Fang Xiaofeng,Liu Jiang,Qu GuiyuORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the vapocoolants for vascular puncture in children and adults.MethodThe search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and The Cochrane Library, from inception to March 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing vapocoolants to control conditions for participants received intravenous cannulation or arterial puncture were included. Two reviewers independently performed selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. The analysis was performed using fixed or random-effects model with mean differences or standardized mean difference and risk ratios.ResultsA total of 25 studies involving 3143 participants were included. Compared with control conditions, vapocoolants may not decrease the pain of patients with arterial puncture (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.92 to -0.19,P= 0.20), but may more effectively relieve pain for adults received vein puncture (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI = -0.85 to -0.45,P< 0.00001). The application of vapocoolant increased the procedural difficulty of medical personnel (RR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.62 to 3.84,P<0.000 1) and participants were more willing to use the spray in the future (RR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.34 to 2.64,P= 0.0002). There was no significant difference for the first attempt success rate of the procedure and the occurrence of adverse events.ConclusionsVapocoolant spray may relieve pain in adults received vein puncture and cannot cause severe side effects, but is ineffective in children. It also had no effect on patients with arterial puncture. In addition, the application of spray increases procedural difficulties for medical professionals, but does not decrease first attempt success rate, and many patients would like to use the spray again for pain relief in the future. Thus, more rigorous and large-scale studies are needed to determine its effectiveness in vascular access.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference64 articles.

1. The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis;J McLenon;J Adv Nurs,2019

2. The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: A scoping review;E Duncanson;PLoS One,2021

3. Fear of needles and vasovagal reactions among phlebotomy patients;B Deacon;Journal of anxiety disorders,2006

4. Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents;KA Birnie;The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,2018

5. Children’s self-reports of fear and pain levels during needle procedures;L Hedén;Nursing open,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3