Racial differences in prevention decision making among U.S. women at high risk of breast cancer: A qualitative study

Author:

Padamsee Tasleem J.ORCID,Muraveva Anna,Meadows Rachel J.ORCID,Hils Megan,Yee Lisa D.,Wills Celia E.,Paskett Electra D.

Abstract

Purpose Women at high risk of breast cancer face complex decisions about how to manage those risks. Substantial gaps in current knowledge include how women make these decisions and how decision making may differ across sub-populations. Among these critical gaps are the questions of (a) whether racial differences exist between the experiences of high-risk women navigating breast cancer risk, and (b) what consequences those racial differences might have on women’s ability to manage their cancer risks. The present study is designed to address these questions directly. Methods Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted with high-risk Black (n = 20) and white women (n = 30) between May 2015 and March 2016 in person in Ohio and by phone. Transcribed data were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Main findings Our analyses suggest that many of the core decision-making dynamics high-risk women navigate differ by race. The experiences of white and Black women in our study differ in terms of (a) contextualizing risk—how women make sense of their own breast cancer risk, the degree to which they worry about risk, and how they prioritize risk within the contexts of their broader lives; (b) conceptualizing risk management–how, how much, and from whom women learn about and conceptualize their options for preventing cancer and/or ensuring that cancer gets diagnosed early; and (c) constraints–the external barriers women face throughout their decision-making and risk-management processes. In sum, the Black women we interviewed reported feeling less well-situated to consider and cope actively with breast cancer risk, less well-informed about risk-management options, and more constrained in their use of these options. Conclusions High-risk women’s accounts of the complex dynamics that shape breast cancer prevention decisions suggest that these dynamics vary substantially by race, such that Black women may experience disadvantages relative to whites.

Funder

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference44 articles.

1. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, Version 1.2020.;MB Daly;J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN,2020

2. Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk;TJ Padamsee;Breast Cancer Res,2017

3. Genetic testing and post-testing decision making among BRCA-positive mutation women: A psychosocial approach.;S Hesse-Biber;J Genet Couns,2016

4. Women’s constructions of the ‘right time’ to consider decisions about risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing oophorectomy.;AF Howard;BMC Women’s Health,2010

5. The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication;R Klitzman;Am J Med Genet A,2010

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3