Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians

Author:

Dewez Juan EmmanuelORCID,Pembrey Lucy,Nijman Ruud G.,del Torso Stefano,Grossman Zachi,Hadjipanayis Adamos,Van Esso Diego,Lim Emma,Emonts Marieke,Burns James,Gras-LeGuen Christèle,Kohlfuerst DanielaORCID,Dornbusch Hans Jürgen,Brengel-Pesce Karen,Mallet Francois,von Both UlrichORCID,Tsolia Maria,Eleftheriou Irini,Zavadska Dace,de Groot Ronald,van der Flier Michiel,Moll Henriëtte,Hagedoorn NienkeORCID,Borensztajn Dorine,Oostenbrink RianneORCID,Kuijpers Taco,Pokorn Marko,Vincek Katarina,Martinón-Torres Federico,Rivero Irene,Agyeman Philipp,Carrol Enitan D.,Paulus Stéphane,Cunnington Aubrey,Herberg Jethro,Levin Michael,Mujkić AidaORCID,Geitmann Karin,Da Dalt Liviana,Valiulis Arūnas,Lapatto Risto,Syridou Garyfallia,Altorjai Péter,Torpiano Paul,Størdal Ketil,Illy Károly,Mazur Artur,Spreitzer Mateja Vintar,Rios Joana,Wyder Corinne,Romankevych Ivanna,Basmaci Romain,Ibanez-Mico Salvador,Yeung ShunmayORCID

Abstract

Background Point-of-care-tests (POCTs) have been advocated to optimise care in patients with infections but their actual use varies. This study aimed to estimate the variability in the adoption of current POCTs by paediatricians across Europe, and to explore the determinants of variability. Methods and findings A cross-sectional survey was conducted of hospital and primary care paediatricians, recruited through professional networks. Questions focused on the availability and use of currently available POCTs. Data were analysed descriptively and using Median Odds Ratio (MOR) to measure variation between countries. Multilevel regression modelling using changes in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of models were used to assess the contribution of individual or workplace versus country level factors, to the observed variation. The commonest POCT was urine dipsticks (UD) which were available to >80% of primary care and hospital paediatricians in 68% (13/19) and 79% (23/29) countries, respectively. Availability of all POCTs varied between countries. In primary care, the country (MOR) varied from 1.61 (95%CI: 1.04–2.58) for lactate to 7.28 (95%CI: 3.04–24.35) for UD. In hospitals, the country MOR varied from 1.37 (95%CI:1.04–1.80) for lactate to 11.93 (95%CI:3.35–72.23) for UD. Most paediatricians in primary care (69%, 795/1154) and hospital (81%, 962/1188) would use a diagnostic test in the case scenario of an infant with undifferentiated fever. Multilevel regression modelling showed that the country of work was more important in predicting both the availability and use of POCTs than individual or workplace characteristics. Conclusion There is substantial variability in the adoption of POCTs for the management of acute infections in children across Europe. To inform future implementation of both existing and innovative tests, further research is needed to understand what drives the variation between countries, the needs of frontline clinicians, and the role of diagnostic tests in the management of acute childhood infections.

Funder

Horizon 2020

Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference42 articles.

1. The prevalence of symptoms and consultations in pre-school children in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): a prospective cohort study.;AD Hay;Family practice,2005

2. Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review;A Van den Bruel;Lancet (London, England).,2010

3. Clinical prediction model to aid emergency doctors managing febrile children at risk of serious bacterial infections: diagnostic study;RG Nijman;BMJ: British Medical Journal,2013

4. A systematic review of parent and clinician views and perceptions that influence prescribing decisions in relation to acute childhood infections in primary care;PJ Lucas;Scandinavian journal of primary health care,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3