Abstract
Background
While vaccination is the most important way to combat the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there may still be a need for early outpatient treatment that is safe, inexpensive, and currently widely available in parts of the world that do not have access to the vaccine. There are in-silico, in-vitro, and in-tissue data suggesting that metformin inhibits the viral life cycle, as well as observational data suggesting that metformin use before infection with SARS-CoV2 is associated with less severe COVID-19. Previous observational analyses from single-center cohorts have been limited by size.
Methods
Conducted a retrospective cohort analysis in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for associations between metformin use and COVID-19 outcomes with an active comparator design of prevalent users of therapeutically equivalent diabetes monotherapy: metformin versus dipeptidyl-peptidase-4-inhibitors (DPP4i) and sulfonylureas (SU). This took place in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) longitudinal U.S. cohort of adults with +SARS-CoV-2 result between January 1 2020 to June 1 2021. Findings included hospitalization or ventilation or mortality from COVID-19. Back pain was assessed as a negative control outcome.
Results
6,626 adults with T2DM and +SARS-CoV-2 from 36 sites. Mean age was 60.7 +/- 12.0 years; 48.7% male; 56.7% White, 21.9% Black, 3.5% Asian, and 16.7% Latinx. Mean BMI was 34.1 +/- 7.8kg/m2. Overall 14.5% of the sample was hospitalized; 1.5% received mechanical ventilation; and 1.8% died. In adjusted outcomes, compared to DPP4i, metformin had non-significant associations with reduced need for ventilation (RR 0.68, 0.32–1.44), and mortality (RR 0.82, 0.41–1.64). Compared to SU, metformin was associated with a lower risk of ventilation (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.28–0.98, p = 0.044) and mortality (RR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33–0.97, p = 0.037). There was no difference in unadjusted or adjusted results of the negative control.
Conclusions
There were clinically significant associations between metformin use and less severe COVID-19 compared to SU, but not compared to DPP4i. New-user studies and randomized trials are needed to assess early outpatient treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis with therapeutics that are safe in adults, children, pregnancy and available worldwide.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
NCATS
National Institute of Digestive, Diabetes, and Kidney diseases
National Institute on Aging
UNC Clinical and Translational Science Award
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference59 articles.
1. Brazil and COVID-19—A Fleeting Glimpse of What Is to Come;AV de Macedo;JAMA Health Forum,2020
2. Barbaro M HJT. he Vaccine Trust Problem [Internet]: [Internet]. National Public Radio 2020 July 21, 2020. Podcast.; 2021. Podcast. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/21/podcasts/the-daily/coronavirus-vaccine.html
3. Targeting COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Minority Populations in the US: Implications for Herd Immunity;JEK Hildreth;Vaccines (Basel),2021
4. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations;S Pushpakom;Nature Reviews Drug Discovery,2019
5. The Availability, Pricing, and Affordability of Essential Diabetes Medicines in 17 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries;ZU Babar;Front Pharmacol,2019