Abstract
This paper investigates the determinants of COVID-19 infection in the first 100 days of government actions. Using a debiased LASSO estimator, we explore how different measures of government nonpharmaceutical interventions affect new infections of COVID-19 for 37 lower and middle-income countries (LMCs). We find that closing schools, stay-at-home restrictions, and contact tracing reduce the growth of new infections, as do economic support to households and the number of health care workers. Notably, we find no significant effects of business closures. Finally, infections become higher in countries with greater income inequality, higher tourist inflows, poorly educated adults, and weak governance quality. We conclude that several policy interventions reduce infection rates for poorer countries. Further, economic and institutional factors are important; thereby justifying the use, and ultimately success, of economic support to households during the initial infection period.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference46 articles.
1. "COVID-19 and income inequality in OECD countries;J. Wildman;The European Journal of Health Economics,2021
2. COVID-19 Outbreak, Mitigation, and Governance in High Prevalent Countries;L. C. Chien;Annals of Global Health,2020
3. "International tourism and outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19): A cross-country analysis;M. R. Farzanegan;Journal of Travel Research,2021
4. Business shutdowns and covid-19 mortality;G. Ciminelli;Available at SSRN 3683324,2020
5. “Are regions equal in adversity? A spatial analysis of spread and dynamics of COVID-19 in Europe,;M. Amdaoud;The European Journal of Health Economics,2021
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献