Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?

Author:

Uscinski JosephORCID,Enders Adam,Klofstad Casey,Seelig MichelleORCID,Drochon Hugo,Premaratne KamalORCID,Murthi Manohar

Abstract

The public is convinced that beliefs in conspiracy theories are increasing, and many scholars, journalists, and policymakers agree. Given the associations between conspiracy theories and many non-normative tendencies, lawmakers have called for policies to address these increases. However, little evidence has been provided to demonstrate that beliefs in conspiracy theories have, in fact, increased over time. We address this evidentiary gap. Study 1 investigates change in the proportion of Americans believing 46 conspiracy theories; our observations in some instances span half a century. Study 2 examines change in the proportion of individuals across six European countries believing six conspiracy theories. Study 3 traces beliefs about which groups are conspiring against “us,” while Study 4 tracks generalized conspiracy thinking in the U.S. from 2012 to 2021. In no instance do we observe systematic evidence for an increase in conspiracism, however operationalized. We discuss the theoretical and policy implications of our findings.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Leverhulme Trust

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference52 articles.

1. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories

2. Consequences of Conspiracy Theories

3. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US;D Romer;Social Science & Medicine,2020

4. Anti-Vaccination Beliefs and Unrelated Conspiracy Theories;ZJ Goldberg;World Affairs,2020

5. Institute QUP. Quinnipiac University Poll, Question 29, 31118230.00028. In: Institute QUP, editor. https://ropercentercornelledu/ipoll/study/31118230/questions#71e322a9-ef8b-4372-b37b-a70b3bc3f06a. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research2021.

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mere exposure to conspiracy theories: effects on radical intentions among believers and nonbelievers;Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression;2024-09-12

2. Left–right political orientations are not systematically related to conspiracism;Political Psychology;2024-09-04

3. Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships;Journal of Applied Social Psychology;2024-09-02

4. The New Satanic Panic;Political Science Quarterly;2024-08-28

5. The Plot Thickens: A Sociology of Conspiracy Theories;Annual Review of Sociology;2024-08-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3