Evaluation of accuracy and performance of self-reported HIV and antiretroviral therapy status in the Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (2018)

Author:

Jahun IbrahimORCID,Ehoche Akipu,Bamidele Moyosola,Yakubu Aminu,Bronson Megan,Dalhatu Ibrahim,Greby Stacie,Agbakwuru Chinedu,Baffa Ibrahim,Iwara Emem,Alagi Matthias,Asaolu Olugbenga,Mukhtar Ahmed,Ikpeazu Akudo,Nzelu Charles,Tapdiyel Jelpe,Bassey Orji,Abimiku Alash’le,Patel Hetal,Parekh Bharat,Aliyu Sani,Aliyu Gambo,Charurat Manhattan,Swaminathan MaheshORCID

Abstract

Background Data on awareness of HIV status among people living with HIV (PLHIV) are critical to estimating progress toward epidemic control. To ascertain the accuracy of self-reported HIV status and antiretroviral drug (ARV) use in the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS), we compared self-reported HIV status with HIV rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results and self-reported ARV use with detectable blood ARV levels. Methods On the basis of responses and test results, participants were categorized by HIV status and ARV use. Self-reported HIV status and ARV use performance characteristics were determined by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Proportions and other analyses were weighted to account for complex survey design. Results During NAIIS, 186,405 participants consented for interview out of which 58,646 reported knowing their HIV status. Of the 959 (weighted, 1.5%) who self-reported being HIV-positive, 849 (92.1%) tested HIV positive and 64 (7.9%) tested HIV negative via RDT and polymerase chain reaction test for discordant positive results. Of the 849 who tested HIV positive, 743 (89.8%) reported using ARV and 72 (10.2%) reported not using ARV. Of 57,687 who self-reported being HIV negative, 686 (1.2%) tested HIV positive via RDT, with ARV biomarkers detected among 195 (25.1%). ARV was detected among 94.5% of those who self-reported using ARV and among 42.0% of those who self-reported not using ARV. Overall, self-reported HIV status had sensitivity of 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.4%–56.0%) with specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8%–99.9%). Self-reported ARV use had sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 93.6%–96.7%) and specificity of 54.5% (95% CI: 48.8%–70.7%). Conclusions Self-reported HIV status and ARV use screening tests were found to be low-validity measures during NAIIS. Laboratory tests to confirm self-reported information may be necessary to determine accurate HIV and clinical status for HIV studies in Nigeria.

Funder

U.S President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference42 articles.

1. The importance of assessing self-reported HIV status in bio-behavioral surveys;Miriam Lewis Sabin Lisa G Johnston;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2016

2. PHIA Project: From arm to freezer: PHIA Project laboratory network supports ambitious HIV testing targets. Available from: https://phia.icap.columbia.edu/from-arm-to-freezer-phia-project-laboratory-network-supports-ambitious-hiv-testing-targets/

3. Who needs to be targeted for HIV testing and treatment in KwaZulu-Natal? Results from a population-based survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr;H Huerga;Internet],2016

4. Detectable HIV viral load in Kenya: data from a population-based survey.;P Cherutich;PLoS One,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3