Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study- REAL study

Author:

Santos Isabela AraújoORCID,Donizeti Ribeiro de Oliveira Renê,Couto Luna Almeida Sergio,Vargas-Santos Ana Beatriz,Balbino Chaves Amorim Rodrigo,Monteiro Gomides Ana Paula,de Albuquerque Cleandro Pires,Barros Bertolo Manoel,Brandão Resende Guimarães Maria FernandaORCID,da Costa Pinto Maria RaquelORCID,Gomes Resende Gustavo,Dalva Neubarth Giorgi Rina,de Carvalho Saciloto Nathalia,Radominski Sebastião Cezar,Borghi Fernanda Maria,Rossi Bonfiglioli Karina,Carrico da Silva Henrique,de Fatima L. da Cunha Sauma Maria,Alves Pereira Ivanio,Werner de Castro Glaucio Ricardo,Viegas Brenol Claiton,Machado Xavier Ricardo,Maria Henrique Mota Licia,Louzada-Junior Paulo,da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro Geraldo

Abstract

Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice. Objectives To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity. Patients and methods We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database—REAL. The composite disease activity indices—DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI–and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. Results DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%. Conclusions Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries.

Funder

Brazilian Society of Rheumatology

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Bristol-Myers Squibb Farmaceutica Ltda

Eli Lilly do Brasil Ltda

Janssen Cilag Farmacêuticos Ltda

Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda

Produtos Roche Quimicos e Farmacêuticos Ltda

UCB Biopharma Ltda

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference48 articles.

1. Rheumatoid arthritis;JS Smolen;Lancet,2016

2. Rheumatoid arthritis;JS Smolen;Nat Rev Dis Prim,2018

3. Multicentric study of the prevalence of adult rheumatoid arthritis in Brazilian population samples;JF Marques-Neto;Rev Bras Reum,1993

4. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study;M Cross;Ann Rheum Dis,2014

5. Long-term outcomes of treat-to-target strategy in established rheumatoid arthritis: a daily practice prospective cohort study;NPB de Andrade;Rheumatol Int,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3