Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates

Published:2017-11-14 Issue:11 Volume:12 Page:e0187511
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Beall Lindsey^ORCID,Myers Teresa A.,Kotcher John E.,Vraga Emily K.,Maibach Edward W.

Funder

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference31 articles.

1. Anderson L, Betsill M. Scientists’ perspectives on navigating the science-policy frontier. Proceedings of the APSA Annual Meeting; 2010 Sep 2–5; Washington, DC.

2. A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy;GG Singh;Front Ecol Environ,2014

3. Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study;D Lach;Biosci,2003

4. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy;RT Lackey;Conserv Biol,2007

5. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics;RA Pielke,2007

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Climate change engagement of scientists;Nature Climate Change;2024-08-05

2. Trust in climate science and climate scientists: A narrative review;PLOS Climate;2024-05-23

3. What’s an Expert, and Why? A comment on Christian Dayé, Experts, Social Scientists, and Techniques of Prognosis in Cold War America;The American Sociologist;2024-04-15

4. The Honest Broker versus the Epistocrat: Attenuating Distrust in Science by Disentangling Science from Politics;Political Communication;2024-03-04

5. The effects of self-disclosure and gender on a climate scientist’s credibility and likability on social media;Public Understanding of Science;2024-02-07