Risk of Bias from Inclusion of Currently Diagnosed or Treated Patients in Studies of Depression Screening Tool Accuracy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Recently Published Primary Studies and Meta-Analyses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Risk of Bias from Inclusion of Currently Diagnosed or Treated Patients in Studies of Depression Screening Tool Accuracy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Recently Published Primary Studies and Meta-Analyses

Published:2016-02-26 Issue:2 Volume:11 Page:e0150067
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Rice Danielle B.,Thombs Brett D.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference40 articles.

1. Screening for depression in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement;Ann Intern Med,2009

2. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: A meta-analysis;AJ Mitchell;Lancet,2009

3. Proportion of antidepressants prescribed without a psychiatric diagnosis is growing;R Mojtabai;Health Aff,2011

4. Clinician-identified depression in community settings: Concordance with structured interview diagnoses;R Mojtabai;Psychother Psychosom,2013

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis;Journal of Affective Disorders;2024-09

2. Comparison of the accuracy of the 7-item HADS Depression subscale and 14-item total HADS for screening for major depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.;Psychological Assessment;2023-02

3. Validity of the patient health questionnaires (phq-2 and phq-9) for screening depression among human immunodeficiency virus patients in Lahore, Pakistan;World Journal of Virology;2022-09-25

4. Transparency and completeness of reporting of depression screening tool accuracy studies: A meta‐research review of adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies statement;International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research;2022-09

5. Inclusion of currently diagnosed or treated individuals in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: a meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021;General Hospital Psychiatry;2022-05