Duration of face down positioning following full-thickness macular hole repair: A protocol for a randomized pilot study

Author:

Nanji KeeanORCID,Oquendo Paola LourdesORCID,Srinivasan Sangeetha,Vyas Chinmayi,Prasad FeminORCID,Farrokhyar Forough,Chaudhary Varun

Abstract

Objective Full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) are defects in the fovea involving all neural retinal layers. They reduce patients’ visual acuity (VA) and impact their quality of life. FTMHs are repaired with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intraocular gas tamponade and post-operative face-down positioning (FDP). There is no consensus regarding the ideal positioning requirements following FTMH repair and there lacks clear guidelines on the topic. While analysis of global practice patterns indicates that between 5–7 days is the most common duration suggested by surgeons, there is significant heterogeneity in surgeon preferences. There is, however, biological plausibility to support minimal or even no FDP following surgery and given the disabling nature of FDP for patients, there is a need to better assess key patient outcomes with different FDP durations. As such, this prospective randomized controlled pilot trial will compare 3-days of FDP to 7-days of FDP following PPV for FTMH. Methods This single-centered, parallel-group randomized controlled pilot trial will randomize patients 1:1 following PPV to 3 days or 7 days of FDP. This investigation has been approved by the local ethics board (HiREB # 16100) and has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06000111). The primary objective will be focused on assessing the feasibility of a larger trial; this will be determined through an assessment of the recruitment rate, retention rate, completion rate and recruitment time. The secondary outcomes involve assessment of the following patient-important outcomes a) macular hole closure rate, b) best-recorded VA, c) a general quality of life measure and vision-specific quality of life measure, d) patient compliance and e) complication rates. Outcomes will be evaluated at 3 months following surgery. Discussion The results of this pilot study will determine the feasibility of a larger-scale trial that will answer a patient important question with clinical equipoise.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference27 articles.

1. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole;JS Duker;Ophthalmology,2013

2. Epidemiology and morphology of full-thickness macular holes.;VA Forsaa;Acta Ophthalmol.,2018

3. Idiopathic Macular Hole Preferred Practice Pattern®;CJ Flaxel;Ophthalmology,2020

4. Macular hole surgery: helpful tips for preoperative planning and postoperative face-down positioning—PubMed;R. Cullen;J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol,1998

5. Functional outcome and patient preferences following combined phaco-vitrectomy for macular hole without prone posturing.;IM Madgula;Eye 2008 228,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3