Deep learning for 3D cephalometric landmarking with heterogeneous multi-center CBCT dataset

Author:

Sahlsten JaakkoORCID,Järnstedt Jorma,Jaskari JoelORCID,Naukkarinen Hanna,Mahasantipiya Phattaranant,Charuakkra Arnon,Vasankari KristaORCID,Hietanen Ari,Sundqvist Osku,Lehtinen Antti,Kaski KimmoORCID

Abstract

Cephalometric analysis is critically important and common procedure prior to orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. Recently, deep learning approaches have been proposed for automatic 3D cephalometric analysis based on landmarking from CBCT scans. However, these approaches have relied on uniform datasets from a single center or imaging device but without considering patient ethnicity. In addition, previous works have considered a limited number of clinically relevant cephalometric landmarks and the approaches were computationally infeasible, both impairing integration into clinical workflow. Here our aim is to analyze the clinical applicability of a light-weight deep learning neural network for fast localization of 46 clinically significant cephalometric landmarks with multi-center, multi-ethnic, and multi-device data consisting of 309 CBCT scans from Finnish and Thai patients. The localization performance of our approach resulted in the mean distance of 1.99 ± 1.55 mm for the Finnish cohort and 1.96 ± 1.25 mm for the Thai cohort. This performance turned out to be clinically significant i.e., ≤ 2 mm with 61.7% and 64.3% of the landmarks with Finnish and Thai cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the estimated landmarks were used to measure cephalometric characteristics successfully i.e., with ≤ 2 mm or ≤ 2° error, on 85.9% of the Finnish and 74.4% of the Thai cases. Between the two patient cohorts, 33 of the landmarks and all cephalometric characteristics had no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) measured by the Mann-Whitney U test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Moreover, our method is found to be computationally light, i.e., providing the predictions with the mean duration of 0.77 s and 2.27 s with single machine GPU and CPU computing, respectively. Our findings advocate for the inclusion of this method into clinical settings based on its technical feasibility and robustness across varied clinical datasets.

Funder

Tekes

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference52 articles.

1. Diagnosis and planning in orthognathic surgery;JP Reyneke;Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician,2021

2. Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking;G Dot;International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2020

3. A critical review on the 3D cephalometric analysis using machine learning;S Alsubai;Computers,2022

4. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning;B Kusnoto;Clinics in plastic surgery,2007

5. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults;WR Proffit;American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3