Professional regulation in the digital era: A qualitative case study of three professions in Ontario, Canada

Author:

Leslie KathleenORCID,Myles SophiaORCID,Alraja Abeer A.,Chiu PatrickORCID,Schiller Catharine J.ORCID,Nelson Sioban,Adams Tracey L.

Abstract

Technology is transforming service delivery and practice in many regulated professions, altering required skills, scopes of practice, and the organization of professional work. Professional regulators face considerable pressure to facilitate technology-enabled work while adapting to digital changes in their practices and procedures. However, our understanding of how regulators are responding to technology-driven risks and the impact of technology on regulatory policy is limited. To examine the impact of technology and digitalization on regulation, we conducted an exploratory case study of the regulatory bodies for nursing, law, and social work in Ontario, Canada. Data were collected over two phases. First, we collected documents from the regulators’ websites and regulatory consortiums. Second, we conducted key informant interviews with two representatives from each regulator. Data were thematically analyzed to explore the impact of technological change on regulatory activities and policies and to compare how regulatory structure and field shape this impact. Five themes were identified in our analysis: balancing efficiency potential with risks of certain technological advances; the potential for improving regulation through data analytics; considering how to regulate a technologically competent workforce; recalibrating pandemic emergency measures involving technology; and contemplating the future of technology on regulatory policy and practice. Regulators face ongoing challenges with providing equity-based approaches to regulating virtual practice, ensuring practitioners are technologically competent, and leveraging regulatory data to inform decision-making. Policymakers and regulators across Canada and internationally should prioritize risk-balanced policies, guidelines, and practice standards to support professional practice in the digital era.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference78 articles.

1. Managing expert knowledge: organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession;J Waring;Organ Stud,2009

2. Expanding scope of practice for Ontario regulated health professionals during COVID-19;S Myles;Health Reform Obs—Obs Réformes Santé,2023

3. Eroding ‘Respectability’: deprofessionalization through organizational spaces;S Siebert;Work Employ Soc,2018

4. How technology is (or is not) transforming law firms;I Rodgers;Annu Rev Law Soc Sci,2023

5. Futre of professional work: evidence from legal jobs in Britain and the United States;M Sako;J Prof Organ,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3