Abstract
Background
The administration of intravenous (IV) medications is a technically complicated and error-prone process. Especially, in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) setting where toxic drugs are frequently used and patients are in critical immunocompromised conditions, medication errors (ME) can have catastrophic reactions and devastating outcomes such as death. Studies on ME are challenging due to poor methodological approaches and complicated interpretations. Here, we tried to resolve this problem using reliable methods and by defining new denominators, as a crucial part of an epidemiological approach.
Methods
This was an observational, cross-sectional study. A total of 525 episodes of IV medication administration were reviewed by a pharmacist using the disguised direct observation method to evaluate the preparation and administration processes of 32 IV medications in three HSCT wards. We reported errors in 3 ratios; 1) Total Opportunities for Error (TOE; the number of errors/sum of all administered doses observed plus omitted medications), 2) Proportional Error Ratio (the number of errors for each drug or situation/total number of detected errors) and, 3) Corrected Total Opportunities for Errors (CTOE; the number of errors/ Sum of Potential Errors (SPE)).
Results
A total of 1,568 errors were observed out of 5,347 total potential errors. TOE was calculated as 2.98 or 298% and CTOE as 29.3%. Most of the errors occurred at the administration step. The most common potential errors were the use of an incorrect volume of the reconstitution solvent during medication preparation and lack of monitoring in the administration stage.
Conclusion
Medication errors frequently occur during the preparation and administration of IV medications in the HSCT setting. Using precise detection methods, denominators, and checklists, we identified the most error-prone steps during this process, for which there is an urgent need to implement effective preventive measures. Our findings can help plan targeted preventive measures and investigate their effectiveness, specifically in HSCT settings.
Funder
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Medical Errors.;N Carver,2023
2. Medication administration error: magnitude and associated factors among nurses in Ethiopia.;SA Feleke;BMC Nurs.,2015
3. Applying action research in pharmacy practice.;K. Saramunee;Res Social Adm Pharm,2022
4. Averting highest-risk errors is first priority;T. Vanderveen;Patient Safety and Quality Healthcare,2005
5. Intravenous cancer chemotherapy administration errors: An observational study at referral hospital in Jordan;TA Al Khawaldeh;Eur J Cancer Care (Engl).,2018