Abstract
Among many types of cancers, to date, lung cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers around the world. Many researchers, scientists, doctors, and people from other fields continuously contribute to this subject regarding early prediction and diagnosis. One of the significant problems in prediction is the black-box nature of machine learning models. Though the detection rate is comparatively satisfactory, people have yet to learn how a model came to that decision, causing trust issues among patients and healthcare workers. This work uses multiple machine learning models on a numerical dataset of lung cancer-relevant parameters and compares performance and accuracy. After comparison, each model has been explained using different methods. The main contribution of this research is to give logical explanations of why the model reached a particular decision to achieve trust. This research has also been compared with a previous study that worked with a similar dataset and took expert opinions regarding their proposed model. We also showed that our research achieved better results than their proposed model and specialist opinion using hyperparameter tuning, having an improved accuracy of almost 100% in all four models.
Funder
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference43 articles.
1. A Brief Symptom Index for Advanced Lung Cancer;S. Yount;Clin Lung Cancer,2012
2. Lung cancer screening: latest developments and unanswered questions;C. M. van der Aalst;Lancet Respir Med,2016
3. Personalising lung cancer screening: An overview of risk‐stratification opportunities and challenges;K. ten Haaf;Int J Cancer,2021
4. Key Statistics for Lung Cancer;American Cancer Society,2024
5. Lung Cancer Survival Rates;American Cancer Society,2024
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献