Abstract
Advancing public health through prevention necessitates collaboration among public, private, and community actors. Only together can these different actors amass the resources, knowledge, and community outreach required to promote health. Recent studies have suggested that university medical centres (UMCs) can play a key role in regional prevention networks, given their capacity to initiate, coordinate, drive, and monitor large partnerships. Yet, the literature often refers to prevention activities in general, leaving underexplored what UMCs can add to primary, universal prevention networks specifically. Moreover, UMCs operate in a crowded field of other organizations with extensive experience in primary prevention, who will already have an idea about what role UMCs should play in the network. This article presents a case study examining the potential role of a UMC within a densely interconnected stakeholder environment in the surroundings of a large city in the Netherlands. Combining insights from public health studies and network governance research, and integrating data from various methods, this study concludes that UMCs can enhance their contributions to prevention by assuming the role of network servants rather than network leaders. Stakeholders consider public health authorities or municipal governments as more logical candidates for coordinating the network. Moreover, partners often perceive–deservedly or not–UMCs as overly focused on the medical aspects of prevention, potentially neglecting social interventions, and as favouring universal treatments over tailor-made community interventions. At the same time, partner organizations hope that the UMCs join collaborations within the community, using their expertise to measure the impact of interventions and leveraging their prestige to generate attention for primary prevention. By synthesizing theoretical insights from multiple disciplines and analysing the empirics of network leaderships through multiple methods, this study offers UMCs a contextually-informed perspective on how to position themselves effectively within primary prevention networks.
Funder
Dutch Research Agenda (NWA)–small projects within the Prevention Route 2020–from the Dutch Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference46 articles.
1. Tackling chronic disease in Europe;World Health Organization;Strategies, interventions and challenges Copenhagen,2010
2. Globalisation and the prevention and control of non-communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adults;R Beaglehole;The lancet,2003
3. Management and prevention strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors;A Budreviciute;Front Public Health,2020
4. A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory;L Hood;N Biotechnol,2012
5. Normen geven de minister urgentie;B. Kiers;Zorgvisie,2020