Abstract
Introduction
There is a need to develop harmonized procedures and a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for cross-border Multi Casualty Incidents (MCI) in medical emergency scenarios to ensure appropriate management of such incidents, regardless of place, language and internal processes of the institutions involved. That information should be capable of real-time communication to the command-and-control chain. It is crucial that the models adopted are interoperable between countries so that the rights of patients to cross-border healthcare are fully respected.
Objective
To optimize management of cross-border Multi Casualty Incidents through a Minimum Data Set collected and communicated in real time to the chain of command and control for each incident. To determine the degree of agreement among experts.
Method
We used the modified Delphi method supplemented with the Utstein technique to reach consensus among experts. In the first phase, the minimum requirements of the project, the profile of the experts who were to participate, the basic requirements of each variable chosen and the way of collecting the data were defined by providing bibliography on the subject. In the second phase, the preliminary variables were grouped into 6 clusters, the objectives, the characteristics of the variables and the logistics of the work were approved. Several meetings were held to reach a consensus to choose the MDS variables using a Modified Delphi technique. Each expert had to score each variable from 1 to 10. Non-voting variables were eliminated, and the round of voting ended. In the third phase, the Utstein Style was applied to discuss each group of variables and choose the ones with the highest consensus. After several rounds of discussion, it was agreed to eliminate the variables with a score of less than 5 points. In phase four, the researchers submitted the variables to the external experts for final assessment and validation before their use in the simulations. Data were analysed with SPSS Statistics (IBM, version 2) software.
Results
Six data entities with 31 sub-entities were defined, generating 127 items representing the final MDS regarded as essential for incident management. The level of consensus for the choice of items was very high and was highest for the category ‘Incident’ with an overall kappa of 0.7401 (95% CI 0.1265–0.5812, p 0.000), a good level of consensus in the Landis and Koch model. The items with the greatest degree of consensus at ten were those relating to location, type of incident, date, time and identification of the incident. All items met the criteria set, such as digital collection and real-time transmission to the chain of command and control.
Conclusions
This study documents the development of a MDS through consensus with a high degree of agreement among a group of experts of different nationalities working in different fields. All items in the MDS were digitally collected and forwarded in real time to the chain of command and control. This tool has demonstrated its validity in four large cross-border simulations involving more than eight countries and their emergency services.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference48 articles.
1. UNISDR. 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Int Strat Disaster Reduct. 2009.
2. Mass Casualty Incident Management for Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons From Central Haiti;SA Rouhani;Disaster Med Public Health Prep,2022
3. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. United Nations. United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination Team UNDAC. Field Manual. Vol. 7th Edition. Accesed Feb 19, 2024; 2018.
4. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) attended by mobile emergency teams with a physician on board;F Rosell-Ortiz;Results of the Spanish OHCA Registry (OSHCAR). Resuscitation,2017
5. Policies for managing emergency medical services in mass casualty incidents;B Adini;Injury,2017