Abstract
Introduction
The burden of injuries globally and in Malawi is substantial. Optimising both access to, and quality of, care in health systems requires attention. We aimed to establish how health facility staff in Karonga, Malawi, perceive barriers to seeking (delay 1), reaching (delay 2) and receiving (delay 3) injury care.
Method
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health facility staff who treat patients with injuries in all health facilities serving the Karonga Demographic Surveillance Site population. The primary outcome was participant perceptions of the importance of delays 1 to 3 following injury. Secondary outcomes were the barriers within each of these delays considered most important and which were considered the most important across all delays stages.
Results
228 staff completed the survey: 36.8% (84/228) were female and 61.4% (140/228) reported being involved in caring for an injured person at least weekly. Delay 3 was most frequently considered the most important delay 35.1% (80/228), with 19.3% (44/228) and 16.6% (38/228) reporting delays 1 and 2 as the most important respectively; 28.9% (66/228) of respondents either did not know or answer. For delay 1 the barrier, “the perceived financial costs associated with seeking care are too great”, was considered most important. For delay 2, the barrier “lack of timely affordable emergency transport (formal or informal)” was considered most important. For delay 3, the barrier, “lack of reliably available necessary physical resources (infrastructure, equipment and consumable material)” was considered most important. When considering the most important overall barrier across all delays, the delay 3 barrier, “lack of reliably available necessary physical resources” received the most nominations (41.7% [95/228]).
Conclusions
Given the awareness of health facility staff of the issues facing their patients, these findings should assist in informing health system planning.
Funder
Royal College of Surgeons of England
King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference74 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017;GA Roth;The Lancet,2018
2. Injuries: the neglected burden in developing countries;RA Gosselin;Bull World Health Organ,2009
3. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013;JA Haagsma;Inj Prev,2016
4. An estimate of the number of lives that could be saved through improvements in trauma care globally;C Mock;World J Surg,2012
5. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution;ME Kruk;Lancet Glob Health,2018