Randomized experimental population-based study to evaluate the acceptance and completion of and preferences for cervical cancer screening

Author:

Lordelo Marcela VieiraORCID,Oliveira Cleyton Zanardo,Aguirre Buexm Luisa,Vieira Reis Rui ManuelORCID,Longatto-Filho Adhemar,Possati-Resende Júlio César,Vazquez Fabiana de LimaORCID,Fregnani José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro

Abstract

Cervical cancer has high incidence and mortality rates, especially in less-developed countries. Prevention methods are well established, but there are still barriers preventing some Brazilian women from undergoing a Pap sample. The objective of the study was to evaluate the acceptance, preferences and completion of four screening methods. This has an experimental design (community trial). A total of 164 participants who had never had a Pap sample or had not had one for more than three years were included. The city’s urban area was stratified by census tracts and divided according to income and education levels. Women belonging to the lower-income strata were considered in the study. Random blocks were numbered into five intervention groups (Group 1- Pap sample at the hospital; Group 2- Pap sample in the mobile unit; Group 3- urine self-collection; Group 4- vaginal self-collection; Group 5- woman’s choice). Only 164 women met all of the eligibility criteria (15.3%). Most of them accepted the assigned method (92%), but only 84% of the women completed the collection step. The acceptance rates were as follows: Group 1 (100%), Group 2 (64.5%), Group 3 (100%) and Group 4 (91.4%). In Group 5, the women’s preferences were distributed as follows: examination performed at the hospital, 13 women (33.3%); examination performed at the mobile unit, 11 women (28.2%); urine self-collection, 11 women (28.2%); and vaginal self-collection, 4 women (10.3%). This study suggests that methods that allow cervical sampling collected near the women’s domicile might improve the acceptance and completion of preventive tests. This finding is relevant for the development of new cervical cancer screening strategies.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference40 articles.

1. IARC. Cancer Today [cited 2023 30 Mar]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.

2. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries;H Sung;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

3. INCA. Estimativa 2023: Incidência de câncer no Brasil [cited 2023 30 Mar]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/estimativa.

4. Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?;R Mullins;J Med Screen,2014

5. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women’s own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial;C Lilliecreutz;PLoS One,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3