Characterizing medical patients with delirium: A cohort study comparing ICD-10 codes and a validated chart review method

Author:

Sheehan Kathleen A.ORCID,Shin Saeha,Hall Elise,Mak Denise Y. F.,Lapointe-Shaw Lauren,Tang TerenceORCID,Marwaha Seema,Gandell Dov,Rawal Shail,Inouye Sharon,Verma Amol A.,Razak Fahad

Abstract

Background Delirium is a major cause of preventable mortality and morbidity in hospitalized adults, but accurately determining rates of delirium remains a challenge. Objective To characterize and compare medical inpatients identified as having delirium using two common methods, administrative data and retrospective chart review. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 3881 randomly selected internal medicine hospital admissions from six acute care hospitals in Toronto and Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Delirium status was determined using ICD-10-CA codes from hospital administrative data and through a previously validated chart review method. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, processes of care and outcomes were compared across those without delirium in hospital and those with delirium as determined by administrative data and chart review. Results Delirium was identified in 6.3% of admissions by ICD-10-CA codes compared to 25.7% by chart review. Using chart review as the reference standard, ICD-10-CA codes for delirium had sensitivity 24.1% (95%CI: 21.5–26.8%), specificity 99.8% (95%CI: 99.5–99.9%), positive predictive value 97.6% (95%CI: 94.6–98.9%), and negative predictive value 79.2% (95%CI: 78.6–79.7%). Age over 80, male gender, and Charlson comorbidity index greater than 2 were associated with misclassification of delirium. Inpatient mortality and median costs of care were greater in patients determined to have delirium by ICD-10-CA codes (5.8% greater mortality, 95% CI: 2.0–9.5 and $6824 greater cost, 95%CI: 4713–9264) and by chart review (11.9% greater mortality, 95%CI: 9.5–14.2% and $4967 greater cost, 95%CI: 4415–5701), compared to patients without delirium. Conclusions Administrative data are specific but highly insensitive, missing most cases of delirium in hospital. Mortality and costs of care were greater for both the delirium cases that were detected and missed by administrative data. Better methods of routinely measuring delirium in hospital are needed.

Funder

Department of Psychiatry-University of Toronto

Medical Psychiatry Alliance

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Canadian Cancer Society

Canadian Frailty Network

Canadian Medical Protective Association

Green Shield Canada Foundation

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ontario Health

St. Michael’s Hospital Association Innovation Fund

University of Toronto Department of Medicine

Glenda M. MacQueen Memorial Career Development Award for Women in Psychiatry

U.S. National Institute on Aging

Milton and Shirley F. Family Chair at Hebrew SeniorLife/Harvard Medical School

Mak Pak Chiu and Mak-Soo Lai Hing Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto

PSI Graham Farquharson Knowledge Translation Fellowship

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3