Knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors of oxygen therapy among health professionals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Aynalem Zewdu BishawORCID,Abera Mekides Nigusu,Yazew Birhaneslasie Gebeyehu,Abate Melsew Dagne,Kassie Ayalew,Meseret FentahunORCID,Muhamed Ahmed Nuru,Abebe Gebremeskel Kibret,Beyene Meseret MekuriawORCID,Tsega Tilahun Degu

Abstract

Background Oxygen therapy is a life-saving intervention used in various healthcare settings to maintain adequate tissue oxygenation while minimizing cardiopulmonary work. Its effective and safe administration depends largely on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of health professionals. However, there are no pooled studies that examined these skills in the context of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of health professionals’ knowledge, attitude, practice, and determinant factors about oxygen therapy in Ethiopia. Methods The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Hinari, Science Direct, African Journal of Online, and Google Scholar were used to search for published studies; Direct Google searches and institutional repositories were used to search for unpublished studies. Duplicate studies were eliminated with Endnote X8 and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of KAP among health professionals. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistics. Publication bias was checked by visual inspection of a funnel plot and Egger’s regression test. STATA version 11 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 14 studies with 2,960 participants for knowledge and practice and 9 studies with 1,991 participants for attitude were used to estimate the pooled prevalence of KAP among health professionals. The pooled prevalence of good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice regarding oxygen therapy were 52.13% (95% CI: 43.88, 60.39), 55.08% (95% CI: 50.80, 59.35%), and 48.94% (95% CI: 41.14, 56.74) respectively. Both good knowledge and positive attitude were affected by the availability of oxygen therapy guidelines, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of 6.11 (95% CI: 2.45, 15.22) and 2.17 (95% CI: 1.39, 3.39) respectively. Additionally, good knowledge (AOR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.53, 12.11), training (AOR: 4.09, 95% CI: 2.04–8.20), and having an adequate oxygen supply and delivery system (AOR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.92–5.07) were statistically associated with good practice. Conclusion and recommendations The national pooled prevalence of good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice among health professionals was low. Therefore, thorough monitoring, supervision, and evaluation of their oxygen therapy is highly recommended for all stakeholders. Yet again, we strongly advise that the identified factors be improved by organizing training sessions, making oxygen therapy guidelines available, and maintaining an adequate oxygen supply system. Trial registration The review protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews with registration number PROSPERO: CRD42023486036.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference77 articles.

1. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the doctors and nurses knowledge of acute oxygen therapy;OO Desalu;PLoS One,2019

2. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice regarding oxygen therapy at emergency departments in Riyadh in 2017: A cross-sectional study;AF Aloushan;World journal of emergency medicine,2019

3. Practice of oxygen use in anesthesiology—a survey of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care;M Scharffenberg;BMC anesthesiology,2022

4. Qualitative exploration of nurses’ perspectives on clinical oxygen administration in Ghana;FE Adipa;International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences,2015

5. Oxygen therapy systems in respiratory failure;EO Ersoy;Journal of Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3