Abstract
The human smile can convey both rewarding and affiliative social intent and thus has significant utility in politics, where the ability to bond with and reassure voters is vital to electoral success. We examine experimental evidence from the 2019 UK general election to investigate the influence of a politician’s reward or affiliative smile on voter emotions. It was hypothesised that the winner’s affiliative smile would engender positive affect across all partisan groups compared to the winner’s reward smile display. Participants from a nationally representative sample were shown campaign footage containing both types of smiles from the leaders of the main competing political parties both before and after the election. Increases in happiness and affinity were revealed across all partisan groups when shown footage of the eventual winner’s affiliative smile; at the same time, supporters of losing parties indicated a decrease in negative affect. Affinity has been shown to increase civic engagement. Thus, we conclude that affiliative smiles displayed by leading candidates during the campaign likely acted as a mechanism to align voter behaviour with the dominant political message.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference62 articles.
1. Masters, R. D. (1989). The nature of politics. Yale University Press.USA.
2. Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992–2004;E. P. Bucy;Journal of Communication,2007
3. Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections;R. K. Beasley;Political Psychology,2001
4. Looking leadership in the face;J. Antonakis;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2017
5. Uleman, J. S., Blader, S. L., & Todorov, A. (2005). Implicit impressions. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 362–392). Oxford University Press.