DEprescribing: Perceptions of PAtients living with advanced cancer. A multicentre, prospective mixed observational study protocol

Author:

Evin AdrienORCID,Bourdon Marianne,Nizet PierreORCID,Hardouin Jean-Benoit,Victorri-Vigneau Caroline,Huon Jean-FrançoisORCID

Abstract

Introduction Polypharmacy in patients with advanced cancer represents a major public health problem, leading to risk of iatrogenesis, decrease of quality of life and increase of healthcare costs. In the field of geriatrics, health policies have been developed to address polypharmacy through the use of deprescribing tools. Recently, palliative care initiatives have been introduced, yet these have not fully considered the specificities of this population, particularly their perceptions. It is therefore important to better understand patients’ perceptions of deprescribing in order to adapt tools and actions to make these approaches more effective. Objectives The aim is to investigate patients’ perceptions of deprescribing in palliative oncology care, and to explore factors that may influence patients’ attitudes and beliefs about deprescribing and to validate a specific questionnaire (rPATD) in this population. An ancillary study will investigate the relationship between patients’ health literacy and their perception of deprescribing. Method A prospective, observational, multicenter study will be conducted using a sequential mixed exploratory design in a population of patients living with advanced cancer and with a physician-estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year. The study will include an initial qualitative phase. Individual semi-structured interviews using a descriptive approach (thematic analysis) will be conducted (upon saturation). Following analysis of the qualitative data, a quantitative study including 300 patients will be realized to meet secondary objectives. Several data will be collected and 2 self-questionnaires will be administered: the BMQ (beliefs about medicine) and rPATD (perception of deprescribing) possibly supplemented by additional items if required by the qualitative analysis. The auxiliary study will be conducted during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients’ level of literacy. Conclusion The disparate outcomes will facilitate the understanding of the perception of deprescribing in palliative oncology care, enabling the development of tailored approaches adapted to this population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials Identifier: NCT06193083.

Funder

fondation de france

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference43 articles.

1. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing;IA Scott;JAMA Intern Med,2015

2. Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review.;CA Cadogan;Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm,2021

3. Associations Between Polypharmacy, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced, Life-Limiting Illness.;Y Schenker;J Gen Intern Med,2019

4. A systematic review of the emerging definition of “deprescribing” with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice;E Reeve;Br J Clin Pharmacol,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3