Abstract
A recent meta-analysis claimed decreasing prospective effects of acting with awareness and non-reacting, two facets of dispositional mindfulness, on subsequent anxiety and depressive symptoms. However, the meta-analytic cross-lagged effects were estimated while adjusting for a prior measurement of the outcome variable and it is known that such adjusted cross-lagged effects may be spurious due to correlations with residuals and regression to the mean. We fitted competing models on simulations of the same meta-analytic data and found that prospective effects of the mindfulness facets on anxiety and depressive symptoms probably were spurious. It is important for researchers to be aware of limitations of adjusted cross-lagged effects, meta-analytically estimated or not, in order not to overinterpret findings.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference19 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017;SL James;The Lancet,2018
2. Predictive associations of dispositional mindfulness facets with anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach.;Á Prieto-Fidalgo;Mindfulness,2022
3. Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research;L Castro-Schilo;Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2018
4. Lord’s paradox in a continuous setting and a regression artifact in numerical cognition research.;K Eriksson;PLoS ONE,2014
5. When is baseline adjustment useful in analyses of change? An example with education and cognitive change;MM Glymour;American Journal of Epidemiology,2005