Abstract
Background and aims
Application of developmental assets, one of existing Positive Youth Development (PYD) frameworks, has gained momentum in research, policy formulations, and interventions, necessitating the introduction of the most efficient scales for this framework. The present study protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales to document the underlying logic, objectives, and methodologies earmarked for the identification, selection, and critical evaluation of these scales.
Methods and materials
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the intended search will encompass databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsycINFO, spanning from the inception of 1988 to 1st of April 2024. The review will include articles published published in English language focusing on individuals aged 10 to 29 years and reporting at least one type of reliability or validity of developmental assets scales. The review process will be in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), and the overall quality of evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.
Discussion
This comprehensive assessment aims to identify potential biases in prior research and offer guidance to scholars regarding the optimal scales for developmental assets in terms of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability The evidence-based appraisal of the scales strengths and limitations is imperative in shaping future research, enhancing their methodological rigor, and proposing refinements to existing instruments for developmental assets.
Funder
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference50 articles.
1. Lerner RM, editor Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases. White paper prepared for the workshop on the science of adolescent health and development, national research council/institute of medicine Washington, DC: National Academies of Science; 2005: Citeseer.
2. Toward a psychology of positive youth development;RW Larson;American psychologist,2000
3. Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs;RF Catalano;The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2004
4. Beyond the’village’rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents;PL Benson;Applied developmental science,1998