Patient reported experience measures on HIV viral load testing at public health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A convergent mixed method study

Abstract

While viral load (VL) testing is critical to effective treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), little is known about patients’ experiences with, and barriers to VL-testing in the context of HIV infection. We assessed patient reported experience measures (PREMs) on VL-testing in public HIV clinics in Tanzania. In a cross-sectional convergent mixed method study, we collected information on VL test related PREMs, clinical and sociodemographic factors. PREMs were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) explored on experience, access, and barriers to VL-testing. Descriptive statistics summarized patients’ factors and PREMs. Logistic regression was used to explore association of patient factors, PREMs and satisfaction with VL-testing services. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. A total of 439 (96.48%) respondents completed the survey, 331 (75.40%) were female, median (IQR) age was 41(34, 49) years. A total of 253(57.63%) had a VL test at least once in the past 12 months, of whom 242(96.0%) had VL<1000 copies/ml. Investigating barriers to VL-testing, most participants (>92.0%) reported good or very good health services responsiveness (HSR). A scale of very good was chosen by the majority for being treated with respect 174(39.6%), listened to 173(39.4%), following advice 109(24.8%), being involved in decisions 101(23.0%), and for communication 102(23.3%). Satisfaction on VL-testing services was significantly associated with respondents following care providers’ advice, (aOR) = 2.07 [95%CI 1.13–3.78], involvement in decisions aOR = 4.16 [95%CI 2.26–7.66], and communication aOR = 2.27 [95%CI 1.25–4.14]. FGDs findings converged with the survey data, with identified barriers to VL test including lack of autonomy in decision making, little awareness on the benefits of the test, long waiting time, stigma, competing priorities for those with comorbidities and transport costs. Satisfaction on VL-testing was largely a result of involvement in decision making, following care provider’s advice and good communication; entities needing universal improvement across the country.