Interventions to increase help-seeking for mental health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Author:

van den Broek MyrtheORCID,Gandhi Yashi,Sureshkumar Diliniya Stanislaus,Prina Matthew,Bhatia Urvita,Patel Vikram,Singla Daisy R.,Velleman RichardORCID,Weiss Helen A.ORCID,Garg Ankur,Sequeira Miriam,Pusdekar Veera,Jordans Mark J. D.ORCID,Nadkarni AbhijitORCID

Abstract

Mental health problems are a significant and growing cause of morbidity worldwide. Despite the availability of evidence-based interventions, most people experiencing mental health problems remain untreated. This treatment gap is particularly large in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and is due to both supply-side and demand-side barriers. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise the evidence on interventions to improve help-seeking for mental health problems in LMICs. The protocol was registered a priori (Registration number: CRD42021255635). We searched eight databases using terms based on three concepts: ‘mental health/illness’ AND ‘help-seeking’ AND ‘LMICs’; and included all age groups and mental health problems. Forty-two papers were eligible and included in this review. Intervention components were grouped into three categories following the steps in the help-seeking process: (1) raising mental health awareness among the general population (e.g., distribution of printed or audio-visual materials), (2) identification of individuals experiencing mental health problems (e.g., community-level screening or detection), and (3) promoting help-seeking among people in need of mental health care (e.g., sending reminders). The majority of interventions (80%) included components in a combination of the aforementioned categories. Most studies report positive outcomes, yet results on the effectiveness is mixed, with a clear trend in favour of interventions with components from more than one category. Ten out of 42 studies (24%) yielded a statistically significant effect of the intervention on help-seeking; and all targeted a combination of the aforementioned categories (i.e., raising awareness, identification and help-seeking promotion). Only six studies (14%) focused on children and adolescents. Due to the limited number of robust studies done in LMICs and the heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes and components used, no definite conclusions can be drawn with regards to the effects of individual strategies or content of the interventions.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference88 articles.

1. GBD Results Tool | GHDX. GBD Results Tool. 2022 [cited 17 Mar 2022]. https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool

2. The World Bank Group. Population, Total—Low & Middle Income | Data. 2022 [cited 7 Sep 2022]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=XO

3. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development;V Patel;The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group,2018

4. Grand Challenges: Integrating Mental Health Services into Priority Health Care Platforms;V Patel;PLoS Med,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3