Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimorbidity in Africa: Developing an expanded conceptual model
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:7
Volume:4
Page:e0003434
-
ISSN:2767-3375
-
Container-title:PLOS Global Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PLOS Glob Public Health
Author:
Dixon JustinORCID, Morton Ben, Nkhata Misheck J.ORCID, Silman Alan, Simiyu Ibrahim G., Spencer Stephen A.ORCID, Van Pinxteren Myrna, Bunn ChristopherORCID, Calderwood Claire, Chandler Clare I. R.ORCID, Chikumbu EdithORCID, Crampin Amelia C., Hurst John R.ORCID, Jobe Modou, Kengne Andre Pascal, Levitt Naomi S., Moshabela Mosa, Owolabi Mayowa, Peer NasheetaORCID, Phiri NozgechiORCID, Singh Sally J., Tamuhla Tsaone, Tembo Mandikudza, Tiffin Nicki, Worrall EveORCID, Yongolo Nateiya M., Banda Gift T., Bickton FanuelORCID, Bilungula Abbi-Monique MamaniORCID, Bosire Edna, Chawani Marlen S., Chinoko Beatrice, Chisala Mphatso, Chiwanda Jonathan, Drew Sarah, Farrant Lindsay, Ferrand Rashida A., Gondwe Mtisunge, Gregson Celia L.ORCID, Harding Richard, Kajungu Dan, Kasenda StephenORCID, Katagira WinceslausORCID, Kwaitana DuncanORCID, Mendenhall EmilyORCID, Mensah Adwoa Bemah Boamah, Mnenula Modai, Mupaza Lovemore, Mwakasungula Maud, Nakanga Wisdom, Ndhlovu ChiratidzoORCID, Nkhoma Kennedy, Nkoka OwenORCID, Opare-Lokko Edwina AddoORCID, Phulusa Jacob, Price AlisonORCID, Rylance Jamie, Salima Charity, Salimu Sangwani, Sturmberg JoachimORCID, Vale Elizabeth, Limbani Felix
Abstract
Multimorbidity is an emerging challenge for health systems globally. It is commonly defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in one person, but its meaning remains a lively area of academic debate, and the utility of the concept beyond high-income settings is uncertain. This article presents the findings from an interdisciplinary research initiative that drew together 60 academic and applied partners working in 10 African countries to answer the questions: how useful is the concept of multimorbidity within Africa? Can the concept be adapted to context to optimise its transformative potentials? During a three-day concept-building workshop, we investigated how the definition of multimorbidity was understood across diverse disciplinary and regional perspectives, evaluated the utility and limitations of existing concepts and definitions, and considered how to build a more context-sensitive, cross-cutting description of multimorbidity. This iterative process was guided by the principles of grounded theory and involved focus- and whole-group discussions during the workshop, thematic coding of workshop discussions, and further post-workshop development and refinement. Three thematic domains emerged from workshop discussions: the current focus of multimorbidity on constituent diseases; the potential for revised concepts to centre the priorities, needs, and social context of people living with multimorbidity (PLWMM); and the need for revised concepts to respond to varied conceptual priorities amongst stakeholders. These themes fed into the development of an expanded conceptual model that centres the catastrophic impacts multimorbidity can have for PLWMM, families and support structures, service providers, and health systems.
Funder
British Academy and Global Challenges Research Fund Wellcome Trust National Institute of Health and Care Research NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|