Abstract
Indigenous Peoples across North America and Oceania experience worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous people, including increased post-operative mortality. Several gaps in data exist regarding global differences in surgical morbidity and mortality for Indigenous populations based on geographic locations and across surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to evaluate disparities in post-operative outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched with no language restriction. Studies reporting on Indigenous populations outside of Canada, the USA, New Zealand, or Australia, or on interventional procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes were post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations, readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Eighty-four unique observational studies were included in this review. Of these, 67 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Oceania n = 31, North America n = 36). Extensive heterogeneity existed among studies and 50% were of poor quality. Indigenous patients had 1.26 times odds of post-operative morbidity (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10–1.44, p<0.01) and 1.34 times odds of post-operative infection (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12–1.59, p<0.01) than non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous patients also had 1.33 times odds of reoperation (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02–1.74, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found that Indigenous patients in North American and Oceania experience significantly poorer surgical outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally, there is a low proportion of high-quality research focusing on assessing surgical equity for Indigenous patients in these regions, despite multiple international and national calls to action for reconciliation and decolonization to improve quality surgical care for Indigenous populations.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference69 articles.
1. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development;JG Meara;The Lancet,2015
2. Global burden of surgical disease: an estimation from the provider perspective;MG Shrime;The Lancet Global Health,2015
3. Health Service Access, Use, and Insurance Coverage Among American Indians/Alaska Natives and Whites: What Role Does the Indian Health Service Play?;S Zuckerman;American Journal of Public Health,2004
4. Robson B, Harris R, Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora A Eru Pōmare. Hauora, Māori standards of health. IV: a study of the years, 2000–2005. Wellington, N.Z.: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora A Eru Pōmare; 2007.
5. Cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians: a matched cohort study;PC Valery;The Lancet,2006