Abstract
Introduction
The population of Africa set to reach 2 billion by 2050. There is therefore great demand for housing across the continent. Research on modified novel designs for housing is a priority to ensure that these homes are not sites of infection for diseases transmission such as malaria. One trial to assess the protection afforded by novel design houses is underway in Mtwara Region, southeastern Tanzania. After constructing 110 of such homes across 60 villages, project staff encountered a certain reticence of the target population to occupy the homes and were faced with accusations of having nefarious intentions. This article explores these accusations, their impacts on home occupancy and lessons for future housing studies.
Methods
This qualitative study drew on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with ten occupants of the intervention homes, six community leaders and a further 24 community members. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated to English for qualitative content analysis.
Results
In communities around the Star Homes, during construction and handover, project staff were widely associated with ‘Freemasons’, a term used to practices, secrecy, and other conspiracy theories in rural Tanzania. These connections were attributed to other community members and explained in terms of knowledge deficit or envy, with others hoping to be allocated the home. The stories were embedded in assumptions of reciprocity and suspicions about study motives, linked to limited experience of research. The relationship between the accusations of freemasonry and reticence to occupy the houses was not straightforward, with project staff or relatives playing a role in decisions. The stakes were high, because the recipients of Star Homes were the poorest families in targeted communities.
Conclusion
The results indicate the need for long-term and proactive community engagement, which focuses on building relationships and providing information through recognizable voices and formats. Given the stakes at play in housing interventions, research teams should be prepared for the social upheaval the provision of free new housing can cause.
Funder
Hanako Foundation, Singapore
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference23 articles.
1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations,; 2022. Report No.: UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3.
2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2019. Report No.: ST/ESA/SER.A/420.
3. Building malaria out: improving health in the home;LS Tusting;Malaria Journal,2016
4. Recommendations for building out mosquito-transmitted diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: the DELIVER mnemonic;SW Lindsay;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,2021
5. Affordable house designs to improve health in rural Africa: a field study from northeastern Tanzania;L von Seidlein;The Lancet Planetary Health,2017