On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study

Published:2011-08-17 Issue:8 Volume:6 Page:e23420
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLoS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Grubb Alicia M.,Easterbrook Steve M.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference28 articles.

1. Scholarly communication – historical development and new possibilities.;N Fjällbrant,1997

2. The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing.;GS McGuigan;Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship,2008

3. Reinventing academic publishing-part 1.;J Hendler;IEEE Intelligent Systems,2007

4. The nine avours of open access scholarly publishing.;J Willinsky;Journal of Postgraduate Medicine,2003

5. Guest editors' introduction: Reproducible research.;S Fomel;Computing in Science & Engineering,2009

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Investigation of Research Quality and Transparency in Neurosurgery Through the Utilization of Open Science Practices;2024-08-05

2. Problems of knowledge, problems of order: the open science field site;Frontiers in Sociology;2023-11-16

3. Sharing Research Data: An Analysis of the Interest of Social Scientists in the Context of a Mexican University;Social Sciences;2021-10-14

4. Evaluating QualiCO: an ontology to facilitate qualitative methods sharing to support open science;Journal of Internet Services and Applications;2021-08-09

5. Framing regenerative medicine: culturally specific stories of an emerging technoscience;BioSocieties;2021-06-16