Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?

Published:2020-07-08 Issue:7 Volume:15 Page:e0235191
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Entradas Marta^ORCID,Bauer Martin W.,O'Muircheartaigh Colm,Marcinkowski Frank,Okamura Asako,Pellegrini Giuseppe,Besley John,Massarani Luisa,Russo Pedro^ORCID,Dudo Anthony,Saracino Barbara,Silva Carla,Kano Kei,Amorim Luis,Bucchi Massimiano,Suerdem Ahmet,Oyama Tatsuo,Li Yuh-Yuh

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference51 articles.

1. Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes;M Entradas;Public Underst Sci,2017

2. Public engagement with science;A. Leshner;Science,2003

3. Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation;F Marcinkowski;Sci Commun,2014

4. How the world’s top universities provide dialogic forums for marginalized voices;SM McAllister;Public Relat Rev,2012

5. Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities?;P. Laredo;High Educ Policy,2007

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring the influence of disciplinary cultures and self-efficacy on the training needs of scientists in Portugal;Cultures of Science;2024-09-13

2. Web-based science communication at Research Institute level: balancing dissemination, dialogue and promotion in a major Italian scientific institution;Frontiers in Communication;2024-09-04

3. Survey-Based Analysis of a Science of Science Communication Scientific Interest Group: Member Feedback and Perspectives on Science Communication;2024-06-28

4. Environmental scientists’ support for public engagement strategy development is predicted by a range of factors, but mostly perceived benefits;International Journal of Science Education, Part B;2024-05

5. The pathology of hype, hyperbole and publication bias is creating an unwarranted concern towards biodegradable mulch films;Journal of Hazardous Materials;2024-02