Machine learning models can predict subsequent publication of North American Spine Society (NASS) annual general meeting abstracts

Author:

Abbas AazadORCID,Olotu Olumide,Bhatia Akeshdeep,Selimovic DenisORCID,Tajik Alireza,Larouche Jeremie,Ahn Henry,Yee Albert,Lewis Stephen,Finkelstein Joel,Toor Jay

Abstract

Background context Academic meetings serve as an opportunity to present and discuss novel ideas. Previous studies have identified factors predictive of publication without generating predictive models. Machine learning (ML) presents a novel tool capable of generating these models. As such, the objective of this study was to use ML models to predict subsequent publication of abstracts presented at a major surgical conference. Study design/setting Database study. Methods All abstracts from the North American Spine Society (NASS) annual general meetings (AGM) from 2013–2015 were reviewed. The following information was extracted: number of authors, institution, location, conference category, subject category, study type, data collection methodology, human subject research, and FDA approval. Abstracts were then searched on the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for publication. ML models were trained to predict whether the abstract would be published or not. Quality of models was determined by using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). The top ten most important factors were extracted from the most successful model during testing. Results A total of 1119 abstracts were presented, with 553 (49%) abstracts published. During training, the model with the highest AUC and accuracy metrics was the partial least squares (AUC of 0.77±0.05, accuracy of 75.5%±4.7%). During testing, the model with the highest AUC and accuracy was the random forest (AUC of 0.69, accuracy of 67%). The top ten features for the random forest model were (descending order): number of authors, year, conference category, subject category, human subjects research, continent, and data collection methodology. Conclusions This was the first study attempting to use ML to predict the publication of complete articles after abstract presentation at a major academic conference. Future studies should incorporate deep learning frameworks, cognitive/results-based variables and aim to apply this methodology to larger conferences across other fields of medicine to improve the quality of works presented.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference28 articles.

1. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications;M Bhandari;J Bone Jt Surg—Ser A,2002

2. Peer Review: Publication’s Gold Standard.;KD Mayden;J Adv Pract Oncol,2012

3. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000–2003).;TL Schulte;Eur Spine J,2012

4. Southern Orthopaedic Association Abstract Publication Rate;MA Tait;J Surg Orthop Adv,2016

5. An In-Depth Analysis of Publication Characteristics of Podium Presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meetings, 2011–2014;R Baweja;Arthrosc.—J. Arthrosc. Relat. SurgArthroscopy,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3