Abstract
The present study investigates the impact of explicit, reflective Nature of Science instruction on students’ evolution acceptance, understanding of evolution as a theory, and understanding of Nature of Science in an introductory biology course. Results revealed similar improvement in evolution acceptance in both the treatment and control groups, but also that Nature of Science instruction had disproportionately large impacts on evolution acceptance for women and individuals who already had high acceptance. We also found evidence of relationships between understanding and acceptance of evolution and Nature of Science understanding, particularly the creativity aspect of Nature of Science. Together, these results suggest that targeted Nature of Science instruction can have differential impacts on students with particular characteristics, such as women and individuals with high acceptance, but also point to the need to consider additional interventions that can reach men and individuals with low acceptance.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution;T. Dobzhansky;American Biology Teacher,1973
2. American Association for the Advancement of Sciences. (2002). AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory. https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-board-resolution-intelligent-design-theory#:~:text=he%20contemporary%20theory%20of%20biological,robust%20products%20of%20scientific%20inquiry.&text=As%20part%20of%20this%20effort,curricula%20of%20the%20public%20schools.
3. How highly religious Americans view evolution depends on how they’re asking about it;C. Funk;Pew Research Center.,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献