Abstract
Higher Education (HE) is seen as a tool to create job opportunities and enhance individuals’ quality of life. Research demonstrates that students’ expectations of career success in HE are an important predictor of their motivation and academic attainment. However, there is a lack of clarity about how career success is defined and whether individuals perceive that their experiences (e.g., gender) may be associated with these definitions. In online written interviews with 36 university students in the United Kingdom, we examine how students define career success and how they perceive their identity (gender, socioeconomic status) experiences underpinning these definitions. We analysed three main definitional themes: (a) career success as personal development, (b) career success as individual mobility, and (c) lack of clarity about what career success is. Findings suggest that gender and socioeconomic experiences had an important role in students’ understanding of career success, especially for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Indeed, in the intersection of gender and socioeconomic status, inequalities persist: female students anticipated difficulties in terms of work-life balance and gender stereotypes that constrained their career success definitions. Moreover, family experiences were important to understand students’ definitions of career success, particularly for disadvantaged socioeconomic groups. The current research sheds light on an important paradox in HE organisations: while students tend to define career success in relatively individualistic ways, such as individual mobility, financial success, or personal development, it was clear that their social identities (e.g., gender, socioeconomic status) and related experiences played an important role in creating definitions of career success. This further implies that when universities encourage a perception of career success as individual mobility, for example, having better job opportunities, or by espousing the belief that higher education and/or professional sectors are truly meritocratic–this will not always align with, and may create tension for, students from disadvantaged groups.
Funder
National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) / Scholarship Program / DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2019
European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference101 articles.
1. Massification of higher education revisited (p. 31);A. Calderon;RMIT University,2018
2. Conceptual learning framework.;OECD;Learning COMPASS 2030. Retrieved from,2019
3. "Access to Success and Social Mobility Through Higher Education: A Curate’s Egg?";S. Billingham;Access to Success and Social Mobility through Higher Education: A Curate’s Egg?, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley,2018
4. The role of universities’ sustainability, teachers’ wellbeing, and attitudes toward e-learning during COVID-19.;M. T. Fülöp;Frontiers in Public Health,2022
5. An introduction to student finance in England.;P. Bolton;House of Commons Library,2021
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献