Psychological safety in European medical students’ last supervised patient encounter: A cross-sectional survey

Author:

Thyness CathinkaORCID,Grimstad Hilde,Steinsbekk AslakORCID

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between European medical students’ psychological safety in and experiences from their last supervised patient encounter. Materials and methods A cross-sectional online survey among European medical students. Bivariable and multivariable linear regression was used to explore the associations between the dependent variable psychological safety and independent variables concerning students’ experiences from their last supervised patient encounter. Results A total of 886 students from more than 25 countries participated. The variables most strongly associated with psychological safety were supervisor coaching and modelling behaviour, adjusted beta 0.4 (95%CI 0.3 to 0.5) and 0.1 (95%CI 0.1 to 0.2) per unit respectively on a one-to-five-point scale, and studying in Northern Europe, adjusted beta 0.4–0.5 compared to other regions. There was a weak negative association (reduced score on psychological safety) for being supervised by a medical doctor with <5 years’ experience and a positive association for student confidence. Student gender, student seniority, speciality, whether peers were present, number of previous encounters with the supervisor and supervisor articulation and exploration behaviour were not associated in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Coaching might be a good primary focus to improve supervision practices, as participation with feedback is known to be beneficial for learning and coaching was strongly associated with psychological safety. Supervisors in western, eastern, and southern Europe might have to work harder to create psychological safety than their northern colleagues.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference29 articles.

1. Edmondson A. The fearless organization: creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. United States of America: Wiley; 2019.

2. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education–a unifying perspective;J. Genn;Medical Teacher,2001

3. Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension;ML Frazier;Personnel Psychology,2017

4. Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature;A Newman;Human Resource Management Review,2017

5. A story half told: a qualitative study of medical students’ self-directed learning in the clinical setting;T-H Liu;BMC Medical Education,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3