Not all movements are equal: Differences in the variability of trunk motor behavior between people with and without low back pain—A systematic review with descriptive synthesis

Author:

Abu Bakar FlorianORCID,Staal J. Bart,van Cingel Robert,Saito Hiroki,Ostelo RaymondORCID,van Dieën Jaap H.ORCID

Abstract

Background Differences in variability of trunk motor behavior between people with and without low back pain (LBP) have been reported in the literature. However, the direction and consistency of these differences remain unclear. Understanding variability of trunk motor behavior between individuals with LBP and those without is crucial to better understand the impact of LBP and potentially optimize treatment outcomes. Identifying such differences may help tailor therapeutic interventions. Objective This systematic review aims to answer the question: Is variability of trunk motor behavior different between people with and without LBP and if so, do people with LBP show more or less variability? Furthermore, we addressed the question whether the results are dependent on characteristics of the patient group, the task performed and the type of variability measure. Methods This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180003). A comprehensive systematic literature search was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Sport Discus. Studies were eligible if they (1) included a LBP group and a control group, (2) included adults with non-specific low back pain of any duration and (3) measured kinematic variability, EMG variability and/or kinetic variability. Risk of Bias was evaluated and a descriptive synthesis was performed. Results Thirty-nine studies were included, thirty-one of which were included in the descriptive synthesis. In most studies and experimental conditions, variability did not significantly differ between groups. When significant differences were found, less variability in patients with LBP was more frequently reported than more variability, especially in gait-related tasks. Conclusions Given the considerable risk of bias of the included studies and the clinical characteristics of the participants with low severity scores for pain, disability and psychological measures, there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions.

Funder

NWO

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference95 articles.

1. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study;D Hoy;Ann Rheum Dis,2014

2. Low back pain 1 What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention;J Hartvigsen;The Lancet,2018

3. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions;NE Foster;The Lancet,2018

4. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain;M van Middelkoop;Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol,2010

5. Series Low back pain 1 What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention;J Hartvigsen;The Lancet,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3