Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) glucocorticoid therapy with those of oral glucocorticoids as a first-line treatment for IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent systemic glucocorticoid therapy for biopsy-proven IgG4-ROD from June 2012 to June 2022. Glucocorticoids were given either oral prednisolone at an initial dose of 0.6 mg/kg/day for four weeks with subsequent tapering or once weekly IV methylprednisolone (500 mg for six weeks, then 250 mg for six weeks), according to the date of treatment. Clinicoserological features, initial response, relapse during follow-ups, cumulative doses of glucocorticoids, and adverse effects of glucocorticoids were compared for the IV and oral steroid groups.
Results
Sixty one eyes of 35 patients were evaluated over a median follow-up period of 32.9 months. The complete response rate was significantly higher in the IV steroid group (n = 30 eyes) than in the oral steroid group (n = 31 eyes) (66.7% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.041). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the 2-year relapse-free survival was 71.5% (95% confidence interval: 51.6–91.4) and 21.5% (95% confidence interval: 4.5–38.5) in the IV steroid and oral steroid group, respectively (p < 0.001). Although the cumulative dose of glucocorticoids was significantly higher in the IV steroid group than in the oral steroid group (7.8 g vs. 4.9 g, p = 0.012), systemic and ophthalmic adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups throughout follow-ups (all p > 0.05).
Conclusions
As a first-line treatment for IgG4-ROD, IV glucocorticoid therapy was well-tolerated, led to better clinical remission and more effectively prevented inflammatory relapse than oral steroids. Further research is needed to establish guidelines on dosage regimens.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献